The Controversy Surrounding Surcharges: Passing on the Cost of Merchant Facilities to Customers in Australia

April 4, 2024

In recent years, there has been a significant debate in Australia surrounding the practice of passing on surcharges to customers to cover the costs associated with merchant facilities. These surcharges, often applied to credit and debit card transactions, have sparked controversy among consumers and businesses alike. This article delves into the issue, exploring the reasons behind surcharges, the impact on consumers and businesses.

Understanding Surcharges

Merchant facilities enable businesses to accept electronic payments, including credit and debit cards, providing a convenience to customers and facilitating transactions. However, these facilities come with associated costs, including transaction fees charged by banks and the corresponding payment facilitators. To offset these expenses, some businesses impose surcharges on customers who choose to pay with cards.

The rationale behind surcharging is straightforward – businesses seek to recover the costs incurred from processing card payments, maintaining profitability, and avoiding absorbing these expenses themselves. Surcharging can vary depending on factors such as the type of card used, the transaction amount, and the industry sector.

Impact on Consumers

For consumers, surcharges can be a source of frustration and dissatisfaction. Paying an additional fee for using electronic payment methods may feel unfair, particularly when cash transactions do not incur similar charges. Furthermore, surcharges can inflate the total cost of goods and services, potentially influencing purchasing decisions and diminishing perceived value for customers.

Critics argue that surcharging penalizes consumers for choosing the option of card payments. However, there’s a significant push towards a cashless society.  So, the question arises… Why impose surcharges when the goal is to promote cashless transactions? Additionally, surcharges may disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, such as low-income individuals or those without access to traditional banking services, who rely heavily on cash payments.

Impact on Businesses

While surcharging provides businesses with a means to recoup transaction costs, its implementation is not without consequences. Charging excessive or unreasonable surcharges can alienate customers and damage brand reputation, leading to reduced loyalty and negative word-of-mouth publicity.

Furthermore, businesses must navigate a complex regulatory landscape governing surcharging practices. In Australia, the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Payment Surcharges) Act 2016 prohibits excessive surcharges on card payments, mandating that surcharges reflect the actual cost of processing transactions. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in hefty penalties and reputational damage for businesses.

Factors Influencing Business’ Decision Making

  • Cost Consideration: Businesses need to evaluate the actual cost of processing different payment methods. Credit card transactions typically incur higher fees compared to debit cards or cash. Understanding these costs is crucial in determining whether to apply surcharges.
  • Competitive Landscape: Analyze industry standards and competitor practices regarding surcharges. Charging significantly higher fees than competitors could deter customers, while charging lower fees might put pressure on profit margins.
  • Customer Base: Consider the demographics and preferences of your customer base. Some customers may prefer the convenience of card payments and be willing to accept surcharges, while others may actively seek businesses that do not impose additional fees.

Strategic Approaches

  • Transparency: Clearly communicate surcharges to customers upfront, preferably at the point of sale. Transparency builds trust and reduces the likelihood of customer complaints or disputes.
  • Differentiated Pricing: Implement tiered pricing structures where surcharges vary based on the type of card used or the transaction amount. This approach reflects the actual cost incurred by the business and can be perceived as fairer by customers.
  • Alternative Payment Methods: Encourage the use of low-cost payment methods such as EFTPOS or digital wallets. Offering discounts for cash payments or incentivizing the use of cost-effective payment methods can help mitigate the need for surcharges.
  • Negotiation with Providers: Explore options to negotiate lower transaction fees with payment service providers or financial institutions. Consolidating transactions with a single provider or leveraging business volume can often lead to favorable terms.

Regulatory Framework

The regulation of surcharging in Australia aims to strike a balance between protecting consumers from unfair practices and ensuring the viability of businesses. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) oversees compliance with surcharging regulations, investigating complaints and taking enforcement action against businesses that breach the law.

Under the ACCC’s guidelines, businesses are required to disclose surcharges transparently to customers, indicating the specific amount or percentage applied to card transactions. Moreover, surcharges must not exceed the merchant’s cost of accepting payments, preventing businesses from profiteering at the expense of consumers.

The debate surrounding surcharges passed on to customers for the cost of merchant facilities in Australia reflects broader tensions between commercial interests and consumer rights. While businesses seek to manage operational expenses and maintain profitability, consumers expect fairness and transparency in pricing practices.

As the payments landscape continues to evolve with technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences, policymakers, regulators, and industry stakeholders must collaborate to establish a framework that balances the interests of all parties involved. Ultimately, achieving a fair and equitable payments ecosystem requires ongoing dialogue, innovation, and regulatory oversight.

Article written by: Chris Arancibia – Principal Business Consultant at Dynamic Corporate Solutions

Want to know more...

Get In Touch